الأبحاث والمؤلفات المنشورة

The following research papers exemplify my commitment to advancing legal scholarship and practice, with a focus on integrating detailed analysis of local practices with global standards.

Arbitration law:

1. Alhasan, T. K. (2025). Arbitral secretaries and the validity of awards: A doctrinal and case law-based evaluation of challenges based on undisclosed assistance. Arbitration International (advance online publication).

Analyzes the evolving role of arbitral secretaries through doctrinal, case law, and institutional frameworks, proposing a ‘disclosure–impact–consent’ standard to safeguard due process and award validity.

2. Alhasan, T. K. (2025). Blockchain-Enhanced Construction Records: Transforming Evidentiary Standards and Dispute Resolution in International Arbitration. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction (advance online publication).

Shows permissioned blockchains embed immutability and authentication in project records, strengthening arbitral evidence; analysis and pilots confirm admissibility, automated compliance, cost reductions, and jurisprudential shift.

3. Alhasan, T. K. (2025). Arbitration in the era of trade wars: Balancing sovereignty and global commerce. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101945

Analyzes arbitration’s role as an adaptable alternative to WTO dispute settlement in trade wars, highlighting sovereignty tensions, enforcement challenges, and hybrid reform proposals.

4. Alhasan, T. K. (2025). Linguistic competence in arbitration: A foundation for equity and efficiency. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction (advance online publication). 

https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1328

Examines how multilingual proficiency, standardized language protocols, and AI‑assisted translation under strict human oversight fortify due process and procedural efficiency in international arbitration.

5. Alhasan, T. K. (2025). Integrating AI into arbitration: Balancing efficiency with fairness and legal compliance. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 42(4), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21470

Examines how AI can streamline arbitral proceedings while safeguarding transparency, accountability, and due process.

6. Alhasan, T. K. (2025). Whether Delegation or Assistance: Clarifying the Role of Tribunal Secretaries in ICC Arbitration. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1375

Analyzes the Belgian Emek Insaat ruling to define permissible tasks for tribunal secretaries under arbitrator supervision.

7. Alhasan, T. K. (2025). Linguistic proficiency disclosures in international arbitration: Enhancing fairness and efficiency. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 38(5), 1805–1827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10261-4

Argues for mandatory language-disclosure rules to prevent fairness gaps in multilingual arbitrations.

8. Alhasan, T. K., & Burr, A. (2025). Beyond Words: Ensuring Due Process in Multilingual Arbitrations. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 38, 2219-2241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10278-9

Analyzes linguistic due process as essential to arbitral justice, highlighting translation gaps and urging reforms under Article V(1)(b) New York Convention.

9. Alhasan, T. K. (2025). From pathology to precision: Transforming multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses in international contracts. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 42(4), 557–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21473

Proposes clarity and enforceability enhancements for multi-tiered clauses in cross-border agreements.

10. Alhasan, T. K. (2024). The devil is in the details: An analysis of the criteria for adequate reasoning in arbitral awards in Jordan. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 41(3), 357–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21412

Reports on a landmark Jordanian court decision underscoring the necessity of clear, reasoned awards.

11. Tarawneh, M. A., & Alhasan, T. K. (2024). Justice in the balance: The crucial role of disclosure in ensuring justice in Jordanian arbitration. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 42(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21427

Highlights how nondisclosure by arbitrators can jeopardize impartiality and recommend harmonization with international norms.

12. Alhasan, T. K., & Al-Hawamdeh, A. M. (2024). Multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses in engineering contracts: A Jordanian legal perspective. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 41(3), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21407

Examines binding nature and procedural implications of DR clauses under Jordanian law, suggesting legislative reform.

13. Alqhaiwi, J., Rayyan, I., & Alhasan, T. (2024). The Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clause and its Applications in Jordan. Dirasat: Shari’a and Law Sciences, 51(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.35516/law.v51i1.3168 (In Arabic)

Reviews real-world sectoral uses of DR ladders and their enforceability challenges.

14. Tarawneh, M. A., & Alhasan, T. K. (2024). Between commitment and reality: A critical examination of Jordan’s adherence to the New York Convention 1958. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 41(4), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21419

Critiques Jordan’s dual-track enforcement system and identifies barriers to seamless award recognition.

Procedural Law:

1. Awaisheh, S. M., Al-Dabbas, N. A., Alhasan, T. K., Odeibat, M., & Kurdi, A. A. (2024). The dichotomy of interests: A comparative analysis of civil and administrative lawsuits in the Jordanian legal system. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 19(1), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19108

Maps the structural and procedural contrasts between Jordan’s civil and administrative courts and pinpoints reform priorities.

2. Awaisheh, S. M., Alhasan, T. K., & Mansour, A. (2024). The Status of Digital Evidence in Administrative Litigation. Al-Balqa Journal for Research and Studies, 27(3), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.35875/pgdx2798 (In Arabic)

Evaluates the admissibility and weight of digital evidence, recommending statutory amendments to strengthen evidentiary standards.

Intellectual Property:

1. Alqhaiwi, J. M. J., Rayyan, I. F. A., Alhasan, T. K. A., & Almajali, T. A. T. (2023). The Effectiveness of Compulsory Licensing in Accessing Vaccines COVID-19 Case Study”. Kurdish Studies, 11(2), 365-382. https://doi.org/10.58262/ks.v11i02.027

Assesses how compulsory licensing accelerates vaccine availability in public-health emergencies and outlines policy lessons for future pandemics.

2. Qtaishat, A., Alhasan, T. K., & Al-Amin, K. (2025). Legal Alchemy: Transforming Stem Cell Innovations into Patents Amid Constraints. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management (accepted for publication).

Analyzes patentability of stem cell technologies in Jordan, addressing TRIPS obligations, Islamic law restrictions, and proposing reforms to reconcile innovation with ethical constraints.

Civil Law:

1. Al-Hawamdeh M. & Alhasan, T. K. (2024) Smart Robots and Civil Liability in Jordan: A Quest for Legal Synthesis in The Age of Automation, Jordanian Journal of Law and Political Science, 16(2), 48-62. https://doi.org/10.35682/jjlps.v16i2.743

Explores liability gaps created by autonomous robots and suggests a hybrid fault-based / strict-liability regime tailored to emerging technologies.

2. Al-Ali, Iman Abdel-Fattah, Al-Awaishea, Saddam Mohammed Aboudi, and Al-Hasan, Tariq Kamal. (2023). The Impact of Term Theory on Administrative Contracts: BOT and FIDIC Contracts as Models. Journal of Legal and Political Sciences, 13(2), 153-192. (In Arabic)

Applies “term theory” to BOT and FIDIC frameworks, demonstrating its influence on contract formation, duration, and risk allocation.

3. Alfawaeer, A. M., Alhasan, T. K., & Alfaoury, A. M. (2023). Ostensible Agency in Jordanian Civil Law: An In-Depth Scrutiny of Juridical Frameworks and The Imperative for Legislative Reformulation. Relações Internacionais No Mundo Atual, 4(42), 810-831.‏ 

http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v4i42.6566

Critiques Jordan’s current doctrine of ostensible agency and proposes legislative updates to protect third-party reliance and transactional certainty.

Administrative Law

1. Alhasan, T. K., Awaisheh, S. M., & Awaisheh, S. M. (2024). The right of public employee to defend disciplinary penalty in Jordan. International Journal of Public Law and Policy, 10(2), 190-203.‏ https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPLAP.2024.137783

Dissects the procedural safeguards afforded to Jordanian civil servants and recommends measures to strengthen due-process protections.

Environmental Law and Sustainable Development

1. Al-Mistarehi, B., Hanandah, S., Shtayat, A., Qtaishat, A., Alhasan, T. K., Al-kharabsheh, B., … & Abdallah, A. (2024). Investigating the Dynamic Creep and the Tensile Performance of Zeolitic Tuff-modified Warm Asphalt Mixtures. The Open Transportation Journal, 18(1).‏ DOI: 10.2174/0126671212297046240315071059

Demonstrates how zeolitic tuff additives improve asphalt durability, supporting greener infrastructure initiatives.

2. Awaisheh, S. M., Alhasan, T. K., Kurdi, A. R., & Awaisheh, S. M. (2023). The Role of Administrative Law in Safeguarding the Environment: A Jordanian Perspective Administrative Law and Environmental Protection in Jordan. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(11), e915-e915.‏ https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.915

Charts how Jordan’s administrative-law apparatus can better enforce environmental norms and proposes policy upgrades.

3. Ze, F., Wong, W. K., kamal Alhasan, T., Al Shraah, A., Ali, A., & Muda, I. (2023). Economic development, natural resource utilization, GHG emissions and sustainable development: A case study of China. Resources Policy, 83, 103596.‏ DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103596

Uses China as a data-rich model to illustrate the trade-offs and policy levers between growth and decarbonization.

Privacy Law:

1. Alhasan, T. K. (2025). Managing legal risks in health information exchanges: A comprehensive approach to privacy, consent, and liability. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management, 44(4), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.70002

Crafts a risk-management roadmap that harmonizes patient privacy with the operational imperatives of electronic health data sharing.

ASHRM Continuing Education: This article qualifies 1.0 CE credit. Pass the online quiz at ASHRM.org/JournalCE to claim hours.

Criminal Law:

1. Al-Wreikat, M. A., Qudah, M. H., Al-Dabbas, N., Alawaisheh, S., & Alhasan, T. K. (2023). Technological Innovations in Penal Policy: An Examination of Electronic Surveillance as A Progressive Alternative to Short-Term Incarceration Within the Framework of Jordanian Legislation. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 5589-5603.‏

Evaluates electronic monitoring as a humane, cost-effective substitute for incarceration and maps its regulatory prerequisites.

Social Law:

1. Abu Issa, H., Al Wreikat, N., Al-Billeh, T., & Alhasan, T. (2025). From streets to screens: Legal implications of internet begging. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), Article 916. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05189-w

Examines internet begging as cybercrime under Jordan’s law, proposing comparative regulatory reforms.

2. Al-Zubi, J.K., Maaqqbeh, M., Awaisheh, S.M., Mofleh, Y.A., Awaisheh, S.M., & Alhasan, T.K. (2024). Progress and Challenges in the Legal Framework of Women’s Rights in Jordan. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 19(1), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19128

Chronicles landmark reforms enhancing women’s legal status while spotlighting persistent cultural and enforcement barriers.